Most Strongly Supported Blogs:
Featured Video
Survey
Loading ...
Stay Connected
Previous Posts:
- Blueprint: The Movie 2.0. This Time, It’s Animated. , September 7, 2010
- What if You Don’t Want to be a Lawyer? , September 3, 2010
- Studying with Victoria: Taking a Beating, Courtesy of Old Mr. LSAT , September 2, 2010
- The 20 People You’ll Meet in Law School , August 31, 2010
Most Strongly Supported LSAT Blogs
Ameliorating the Pernicious Nature of LSAT Vocabulary
The LSAT, thank God, is not a vocabulary test. Unlike the GRE, you don’t have to sit down with a bunch of flashcards learning words that you would never see outside of a David Foster Wallace novel. LSAC is testing your logical reasoning ability, and they know that your knowledge of esoteric words doesn’t really say anything about your law-student potential, so you not knowing what “defenestration” means isn’t going to defenestrate your score (figuratively speaking). So there’s no need to supplement your LSAT books with a thesaurus.
“But reading comp asks you the meaning of strange words all the time!” you say. That is true. And yes, I know what I just said about the LSAT not requiring knowledge of advanced vocabulary. The thing is, the test writers know that not many of you were English majors or read Joyce for fun. When you get vocab questions in RC, what they expect is for you to get the meaning from context. You will rarely know the word, but you will always be able to answer the question nonetheless. So again, no major vocab needed. But don’t get all quiescent just yet.
(more…)





